Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < December 6 | December 8 > |
|---|
December 7
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Forum mall Karachi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Kamranyosuf (talk · contribs) has uploaded many copyvio images. Absent some confirmation that he is the creator, I feel the the remaining three should be deleted. They were taken with 3 different models of camera. Not a good sign. As well as this image I'd like to include:
- File:Jahangir kothari Karachi.jpg
and
in the nomination. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Forum mall Karachi.jpg looks like a copyright violation from http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2008/02/hugh_is_in_pakistan.shtml MilborneOne (talk) 13:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved to Commons where this is an acceptable free image. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rajaji1939.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The picture says it was taken on June 1, 1939 and is in public domain in India. It may not be in public domain in US as it was not in public domain in India as of January 1, 1996. --CarTick 05:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Qklogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate (musician's) logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. No substantial evidence to believe this file is in violation of any copyright. — ξxplicit 21:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, no source for base map image Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Its written in its description that i have created tht map. so there is no question of free or un free when I, its creator, have allowed its copy etc etc under GNU Free Documentation License.
Is there any other issue ? regards الله أكبرMohammad Adil 09:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:QJudo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Quack poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Created by Warren Dayton claims to be from Life magazine, highly doubtful this is Cc licensed Skier Dude (talk) 07:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Quanta Services Logo.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RACE Broadway artwork.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Broadway production promo material; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RADIOHAMPSHIRE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate (radio stn) logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RAK AIR LOGO.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:REAL Ultimate Power.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- book cover; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate cover Skier Dude (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:REF2 Clajot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- note original upload - clear (c) mark there Skier Dude (talk) 07:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The original photographer is the uploader. They correctly licensed it for our use. I removed the watermark. Miami33139 (talk) 08:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; close examination shows that it is not the same logo. It may be inappropriate anyway, but that's outside the remit of PUI. I will list it at WP:FFD. Chick Bowen 02:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:REDRESSlogolow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This does seem to be user-created, though it is highly similar to the website's banner. Even so, it would fall under {{PD-text}}. — ξxplicit 05:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:REPinteractive.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate logo; no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate corporate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 07:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RFS Wildlife.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Watermarked image, no source or useful metadata Skier Dude (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. No substantial reason to believe this file is in violation of copyright. — ξxplicit 21:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rwanda2 Clajot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- note first version - clear (c) watermark Skier Dude (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The photographer uploaded the original image and licensed it correctly. I removed the watermark. Miami33139 (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (and tagged so) the source page [1] states "© ALL PICTURES ARE COPYRIGHTED BY PHOTOGRAPHER" - nothing there is released as CC. Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, his website may say that, but he uploaded them to Wikipedia in lower resolution than his website and licensed it to us. Miami33139 (talk) 10:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, and based on the watermark embedded by the uploader, different watermarks that can be found on the web, edits like this where he inserted links to the jmclajot.net website, I don't have doubt that the uploader and the photographer are the same person. IF someone does, I can e-mail the photographer and ask. Amalthea 12:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, his website may say that, but he uploaded them to Wikipedia in lower resolution than his website and licensed it to us. Miami33139 (talk) 10:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep uploader was the photographer on that web site. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ROB-smallFSFE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover; no source, no useful metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ROBpress1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- album cover (?); no source, no metadata; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art posing as legitimate imagery Skier Dude (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wow signal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is from Ohio State University, and is not a product of the US Federal Government. Mtruch (talk) 17:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No source, no evidence that image has been released as described, image not used in any article MilborneOne (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AshtavinayakaRouteMap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Self-declared as a picture from a hard copy, although it has not exif data. No evidence map has been released into the public domain and has been marked pd-self with cant be right MilborneOne (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NGPRLYSTN.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small 420x240 low quality image released as pd-self with no exif data, possibly not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 23:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NGPUniv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small 190x124 low quality image released as pd-self with no exif data, possibly not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 23:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tonibraxton 2009 .JPEG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Haven't found an exact match, but based on the other uploads of the user I'm convinced that he doesn't own copyright of that image. It's been taken at the 9th Annual Lupus LA Orange Ball at the Beverly Wilshire Four Seasons, there's a highly similar WireImage picture at life.com, and the uploader would have had to stand right next to him. Lacks, at the very least, proof that he owns copyright, the uploaded image size suggests that he has in fact found it somewhere on the web. Amalthea 23:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AshtvinayakOM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Small 278x270 low quality image released as pd-self with no exif data, possibly not the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.